The value of land as an indicator of the level of sustainability of the agricultural land use system
Abstract
The article deals with the features of sustainable functioning of the agricultural land use system. It is substantiated that the sustainability of land use characterizes satisfactory economic growth in a stable environmental situation, and value characterizes the maintenance of a satisfactory ecological state of resources while ensuring the required level of economic progress. "Sustainability" and "value" have been shown to be interrelated and complementary components of the agricultural land use system and can be studied in their separate trajectories according to environmental or economic direction. Based on the research, the author specified the understanding of the value, usefulness and value of agricultural land for individual public entities. It is proved that the value and value of land can vary significantly. It is substantiated that the normative monetary valuation to some extent characterizes the value of agricultural land, but the real market value of land is reflected in the results of expert monetary valuation. It is determined that the market value of land differs significantly by regions of Ukraine, and sometimes even within one region. The author emphasizes that it is the methodological approaches of expert monetary valuation involve the study of logistical, agri-environmental, socio-economic indicators of land market development, changes in which in modern conditions are the most dynamic. It is determined that due to the significant difference between normative and market indicators of land value there are differences of interests of the participants of land relations. In order to overcome the conflict of interests, a scientific and methodological approach to reconciling the interests of sellers and buyers of land is proposed. It is substantiated that in the presence of a conflict of interest, a zone of coordination of cost decisions should be identified, where the value values obtained as a result of agreements can be considered optimal. The use of this scenario involves reconciling the interests of the seller and the buyer through the convergence of the benefits received by the seller and the benefits acquired by the buyer.
References
Pashkov I.A. (2009). Systemni osnovy staloho zemlekorystuvannya v Ukrayini [Systemic bases of sustainable land use in Ukraine]. Visnyk Zaporizʹkoho natsionalʹnoho universytetu. № 1 (4). PP. 149–155.
Dobryak D.S., Tykhonov A.H. & Hrebenyuk N.V. (2004). Teoretychni zasady staloho rozvytku zemlekorystuvannya u silʹsʹkomu hospodarstvi [Theoretical principles of sustainable land use development in agriculture]. Kyiv: Urozhay, 136 p.
Tretyak V.M., Sventukh V.Y. (2015). Stale (zbalansovane) zemlekorystuvannya yak faktor pidvyshchennya ekonomichnoyi efektyvnosti vykorystannya silʹsʹkohospodarsʹkykh zemelʹ [Sustainable (balanced) land use as a factor in improving the economic efficiency of agricultural land use.]. Zemleustriy, kadastr i monitorynh zemelʹ. № 4. PP. 24–30.
Hreshchuk H.I. (2018). Teoretyko-metodolohichni zasady zemlevporyadnoho zabezpechennya staloho vykorystannya zemelʹ silʹsʹkohospodarsʹkoho pryznachennya [Theoretical and methodological principles of land management for sustainable use of agricultural land]. Zbalansovane pryrodokorystuvannya. № 4. PP. 112–120.
Melʹnychuk L.S. (2014). Problemy staloho ta ratsionalʹnoho zemlekorystuvannya v Ukrayini [Problems of sustainable and rational land use in Ukraine]. Hlobalʹni ta natsionalʹni problemy ekonomiky. Mykolayivsʹkyy natsionalʹnyy universytet im. V.O. Sukhomlynsʹkoho. Vol. 2. PP. 910–914.
Slovnyk ukrayinsʹkoyi movy: v 11 t. AN URSR. (1978). [Dictionary of the Ukrainian language]. Instytut movoznavstva; za red. I.K. Bilodida. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, T. 9. 917 p.
Filosofsʹkyy entsyklopedychnyy slovnyk (2002). [Philosophical encyclopedic dictionary] / za red. V.I. Shynkaruka. Kyiv: Abrys, 742 p.
But Y.S. (2011). Kontseptualʹni pidkhody do vyvchennya navkolyshnʹoho seredovyshcha yak faktoru mizhnarodnoyi ekonomiky [Conceptual approaches to the study of the environment as a factor in the international economy]. Aktualʹni problemy mizhnarodnykh vidnosyn. Vyp. 101 (Chastyna II). PP. 98–105.
Myuller V., Zubkov M. & Fediyenko V. (2011). Suchasnyy anhlo-ukrayinsʹkyy ta ukrayinsʹko-anhliysʹkyy slovnyk: 200 000 sliv. [Modern English-Ukrainian and Ukrainian-English dictionary: 200,000 words]/ nauk. ta lit. redaktor Kononenko K.M. Vyd. 3, vypr. ta dop. Kharkiv: VD «SHKOLA», 944 p.
Myuller V.K. (1990). Anglo-russkiy slovar [English-Russian dictionary]. Moskva: Russkiy yazyk, 848 p.
Kolstad, Charles D. (1999). Environmental Economics. Oxford University Press, Inc., 400 p.
Bordyuzha A. (2015). Teoretyko-metodychnyy pidkhid do ekoloho-ekonomichnoho otsinyuvannya silʹsʹkohospodarsʹkoho zemlekorystuvannya [Theoretical and methodological approach to ecological and economic assessment of agricultural land use]. Ekonomichnyy dyskurs. Mizhnarodnyy zbirnyk naukovykh pratsʹ. Vol. 4. PP. 28–36.
Druhak V.M. (2013). Ekolohiya zemlekorystuvannya v systemi suspilʹnykh zemelʹnykh interesiv Ukrayiny [Ecology of land use in the system of public land interests of Ukraine]. Naukovyy visnyk NLTU Ukrayiny. Vyp. 23.17. PP. 72–79.
Tyurgo A.R. (1961). Izbrannyye ekonomicheskiye proizvedeniya [Selected economic works]/ per. s frants. L.M. Brodskoy i A.N. Miklashevskogo. Moskva: Sotsekgiz, 198 p.
Markus Y.I. (2010). Ot tsennosti k stoimosti [From value to value] / pod obshch. red. Praktika otsenki imushchestva. Kyiv: Ukrainskaya investitsionnaya gazeta, № 2. 240 p.
Natsionalʹnyy standart № 1 «Zahalʹni zasady otsinky mayna i maynovykh prav» [National Standard № 1 "General principles of property valuation and property rights"]. Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrayiny vid 10.09.2003 roku za № 1440.
Pro otsinku zemelʹ [About land valuation] (2004). Zakon Ukrayiny. Vidomosti Verkhovnoyi Rady Ukrayiny. № 15. St. 229.
