FORMING THE INTERACTION OF KEY STAKEHOLDERS TO ENSURE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INNOVATIVE PROCESSES IN THE SOCIAL SECTOR
Abstract
The article substantiates the formation of interaction of key stakeholders to ensure the efficiency of innovation processes of the social sector on the basis of a model of four-level interaction, where the key stakeholders are the State, private partner, investors (sponsors), special agencies, innovation clusters and the final consumer (population of the country). Each level of interaction has its own characteristics and corresponding impact on the efficiency of innovation processes, which can only be achieved if the relevant requirements and criteria are met. The result of the formation of the interaction of key stakeholders is a certain degree of involvement of relevant stakeholders who are actively involved in the process of planning, development and implementation of social policy, which can be implemented through the use of the responsibility map of institutions in the formation of policy for the development of social infrastructure of territories.
References
Дєгтяр, А., & Серьогіна-Берестовська, О. (2018). Theoretical aspects of management of development of social infrastructure in the region. Public Management, 5 (15), 233–243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-2224-2018-15-5-233-243
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOS-viewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Caballero-Morales. (2021). Innovation as recovery strategy for SMEs in emerging economies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Research in International Business and Finance, 57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101396
Yang. (2016). Innovative application of the public-private partnership model to the electric vehicle charging infrastructure in China. Sustainability, 8(8). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080738
Klievink. (2014). Developing Multi-Layer Information Infrastructures: Advancing Social Innovation through Public-Private Governance. Information Systems Management, 31(3), 240–249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2014.923268
Živojinović. (2019). Social innovation to sustain rural communities: Overcoming institutional challenges in Serbia. Sustainability, 11(24). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247248
Mont, O. (2014) Sustainable lifestyles 2050: Stakeholder visions, emerging practices and future research. Journal of cleaner production. [Online] 6324–32.
Marti. (2023). Analysis of European competitiveness based on its innovative capacity and digitalization level. Technology in Society, 72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102206
McCoyd, J. L., Curran, L., Candelario, E., Findley, P. A., & Hennessey, K. (2023). Social service providers under COVID-19 duress: adaptation, burnout, and resilience. Journal of Social Work, 23(1), 85–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14680173221109414
Bricocoli, M., Marani, B., & Sabatinelli, S. (2022). The Spaces of Social Services as Social Infrastructure: Insights From a Policy-Innovation Project in Milan. Urban Planning, 7(4), 381–397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i4.5720
Stoustrup, S.W. (2022) A rural laboratory in the Austrian alm—Tracing the contingent processes fostering social innovation at the local level. Sociologia Ruralis, 62, 542–563. DOI: https://doi-org.sire.ub.edu/10.1111/soru.12372
Biggs, R., Westley, F.R. & Carpenter, S.R. (2010) Navigating the back loop: fostering social innovation and transformation in ecosystem management. Ecology and Society, 15(2), 9.
Danko, Y. I., & Reznik, N. P. (2019). Contemporary challenges for China and Ukraine and perspectives for overcoming these challenges. Global Trade and Customs Journal, 14(6).
Nifatova, O., Ladyka, V., Hryshyna, Y., & Danko, Y. (2023). Agricultural education in times of war: Strategic visions, leadership practices and post-war reconstruction. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21, 87–97.
