ASSESSMENT OF THE STATE OF DEVELOPMENT OF ECOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC SYSTEMS AND CIVIL SECURITY
Abstract
The article focuses on the comprehensive assessment of the development of ecological and economic systems and civil security under conditions of significant environmental, economic, and social challenges. The relevance of the research is determined by the need for an integrated analytical approach that combines environmental, economic, physical, psychological, and cyber security dimensions into a single evaluation framework. The purpose of the study is to develop and test a methodological approach to assessing the state of development of ecological and economic systems and civil security based on a system of specialized indicators. The methodology is based on the formation of a multilevel system of indicators that reflect the dynamics of environmental, economic, and security parameters. The approach includes the development of one hundred annual indicators with different target orientations, normalization of their dynamics, and the construction of special indices. Comparative analysis across different time periods and the integration of heterogeneous data sources are applied. Artificial intelligence technologies are used to process large datasets and to build an integrated development map. The results demonstrate the feasibility of assessing the overall state of development of ecological, economic, and civil security systems using an integrated system of indices. The assessment reveals uneven development, the impact of destructive factors on environmental and economic indicators, and the growth of psychological and cyber threats. At the same time, the overall state of development is characterized as generally positive, indicating the presence of adaptive capacity. The practical value of the study lies in creating an integrated information base and analytical toolkit for strategic planning, monitoring, and decision-making. The proposed approach allows the identification of priority investment areas, the development of regional recovery scenarios, and the strengthening of civil security measures in conditions of uncertainty and crisis transformations.
References
Scalamonti F. The sustainable development index: An integration of the ecological framework considering the governance-development nexus. 2024. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4733789
Mushtaq M., Ahmed S., Abbas A., Fahlevi M. Impact of urbanization on environmental eminence: Moderating role of renewable energy. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy. 2024. Vol. 14, No. 2. P. 244–257.
Zhou L., You C., Qu H., Guo L., Zhang H. Unraveling the nonlinear relationship between ecosystem services and sustainable development goals based on machine learning. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2025. P. 1–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-07018-1
Bie Q., Wang S., Qiang W., Ma X., Gu Z., Tian N. Progress toward Sustainable Development Goals and interlinkages between them in Arctic countries. Heliyon. 2023. Vol. 9, No. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13306
Henrysson M., Swain R. B., Swain A., Nerini F. F. Sustainable Development Goals and wellbeing for resilient societies: Shocks and recovery. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2024. Vol. 11, No. 1. P. 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03973-8
Melnykovych M., Nijnik M., Soshenskyi O., Zibtsev S., Lobchenko G., Sarkki S., Voloshyna N., Soloviy I., Kravets P., Khan Y., Yaroshchuk R., Keeton W. S., Rosset C., Pauli B., Garcia C. A., Waeber P. O. Pathways for Ukraine’s Post-War Recovery: Forest Socio-Ecological System in the Focus. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202502.1736.v1
Kovalenko B. Risk-sensitive modeling framework of circular economy development in the system of economic security. Economy and Society. 2025. No. 81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2025-81-123
Yang Y., Zhu X. Eco-environmental risk assessment and its precaution partitions based on a knowledge graph: A case study of Shenzhen City, China. Sustainability. 2024. Vol. 16, No. 2. Art. 909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020909
Jehn F. U., Engler J. O., Arnscheidt C. W., Wache M., Ilin E., Cook L. та ін. The state of global catastrophic risk research: A bibliometric review. Earth System Dynamics. 2025. Vol. 16, No. 4. P. 1053–1084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1053-2025
Fearnley C. Early warning of complex climate risk with integrated artificial intelligence. Research Square. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4248340/v1
Arce D. Cybersecurity for defense economists. Defence and Peace Economics. 2023. Vol. 34, No. 6. P. 705–725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2022.2138122
Вороненко В. І. та ін. Цифрові трансформації для забезпечення еколого-економічного розвитку та цивільного захисту : монографія; за заг. ред. О. В. Кубатка, В. І. Вороненка. Суми : СумДУ, 2025. 195 с.
Scalamonti, F. (2024). The Sustainable Development Index: An integration of the ecological framework considering the governance-development nexus. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4733789.
Mushtaq, M., Ahmed, S., Abbas, A., & Fahlevi, M. (2024). Impact of urbanization on environmental eminence: Moderating role of renewable energy. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 14(2), 244-257.
Zhou, L., You, C., Qu, H., Guo, L., & Zhang, H. (2025). Unraveling the nonlinear relationship between ecosystem services and sustainable development goals based on machine learning. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-07018-1
Bie, Q., Wang, S., Qiang, W., Ma, X., Gu, Z., & Tian, N. (2023). Progress toward Sustainable Development Goals and interlinkages between them in Arctic countries. Heliyon, 9(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13306
Henrysson, M., Swain, R. B., Swain, A., & Nerini, F. F. (2024). Sustainable Development Goals and wellbeing for resilient societies: shocks and recovery. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03973-8
Melnykovych, M., Nijnik, M., Soshenskyi, O., Zibtsev, S., Lobchenko, G., Sarkki, S., Voloshyna, N., Soloviy, I., Kravets, P., Khan, Y., Yaroshchuk, R., Keeton, W. S., Rosset, C., Pauli, B., Garcia, C. A., & Waeber, P. O. (2025). Pathways for Ukraine’s Post-War Recovery: Forest Socio-Ecological System in the Focus. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202502.1736.v1
Kovalenko, B. (2025). Risk-sensitive modeling framework of circular economy development in the system of economic security. Economy and Society, (81). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2025-81-123
Yang, Y., & Zhu, X. (2024). Eco-Environmental Risk Assessment and Its Precaution Partitions Based on a Knowledge Graph: A Case Study of Shenzhen City, China. Sustainability, 16(2), 909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020909
Jehn, F. U., Engler, J. O., Arnscheidt, C. W., Wache, M., Ilin, E., Cook, L., ... & Kemp, L. (2025). The state of global catastrophic risk research: a bibliometric review. Earth System Dynamics, 16(4), 1053-1084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1053-2025
Fearnley, C. (2024). Early warning of complex climate risk with integrated artificial intelligence. Research Square (Research Square). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4248340/v1
Arce, D. (2023). Cybersecurity for defense economists. Defence and Peace Economics, 34(6), 705-725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2022.2138122
Voronenko, V. I., ta in. (2025). Tsyfrovi transformatsii dlia zabezpechennia ekoloho-ekonomichnoho rozvytku ta tsyvilnoho zakhystu (O. V. Kubatko & V. I. Voronenko, red.). SumDU.
