Methodological approach to measuring progress towards a closed-loop economy model

Keywords: circular economy, closed-loop economy, circular metrics, progress measuring, recycling, resource cycle, reuse, waste management


The novelty of this study is to refine a methodological approach towards measuring the circular economy progress based on the evaluation of indicators by individual segments of the resource cycle. In our view, the segmentation of the resource cycle could be an effective tool for measuring the progress towards a circular economy by investigating structural changes in the resource cycles of the territory caused by closing and slowing the material loop. Existing practices of measuring the progress, based mainly on reuse and recycling indicators, does not fully reflect such concepts as the lifecycles of a material and product, measured by the number of turns and duration. Besides, metrics need to be developed to answer the question of how fully the available circularity potential is used to provide the implementation of 6Rs strategies for a particular territory. The findings are the basis for developing a circular data framework for enterprises in all economic sectors from mining of raw materials to manufacturing of finished products, from collection of end-of-life products via restoration to manufacturing of recycled products.


1. Губанова Е.Р. Механизм экономико-экологического стимулирования использования вторичных ресурсов, Одесса: «ТЭС», 2009, 280 с.
2. Комар И. Рациональное использование природных ресурсов и ресурсные циклы, М.: «Наука», 1975, 211 c.
3. Ayres, R.U. Industrial metabolism: theory and policy, The Greening of Industrial Ecosystems, National Academy Press, Wash-ington, 1994, pp. 23-37.
4. Bakker, C.A., Wang, F., Huisman, J., Den Hollander, M. Products that go round: Exploring product life extension through de-sign // Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 69, 2014, pp.10-16.
5. Bailey, R., Bras, B., Allen, J.K. Measuring material cycling in industrial systems // Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 52, 2008, pp.643-652.
6. Benyus, J. Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature. New York, USA: William Morrow & Company, 1997.
7. Boulding, K.E., The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth. In H. Jarrett (ed.). Environmental Quality in a Growing Econ-omy, Baltimore, MD: Resources for the Future/Johns Hopkins University Press, 1966, pp. 3-14.
8. Braungart, M., McDonough, W., Bollinger, A. Cradle-to-cradle design: creating healthy emissions – a strategy for eco-effective product and system design // Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 15, 2007, pp. 1337-1348.
9. Blomsma, F., Brennan, G. The Emergence of Circular Economy A New Framing Around Prolonging Resource Productivity // Journal of Industrial Ecology, Special Issue: Exploring the Circular Economy, Vol. 21, No.3, 2017, pp. 603-614.
10. Bruel, A., Kronenberg, J., Troussier, N., Guillaume, B. Linking Industrial Ecology and Ecological Economics: A Theoretical and Empirical Foundation for the Circular Economy // Journal of Industrial Ecology. Vol. 23, No.1, 2018, pp. 12-21.
11. Cayzer, S., Griffiths, P., Beghetto V. Design of indicators for measuring product performance in the circular economy // International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, Published online: 26 Jun 2017.
12. Chen, W., Graedel, T.E. Anthropogenic cycles of the elements: A critical review // Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 46, No.16, 2012, pp. 8574-8586.
13. Commoner, B. The Closing Circle: Nature, Man and Technology. New York, 1971.
14. Den Hollander, M.C., Bakker, C.A., Hultink, E.J. Product Design in a Circular Economy: Development of a Typology of Key Concepts and Terms // Journal of Industrial Ecology, Special Issue: Exploring the Circular Economy, Vol. 21, No.3, 2017, pp. 517-525.
15. Ellen-MacArthur-Foundation and Granta Circularity indicators. An approarch to measuring circularity. Methodology, 2017, 98 p.
16. Ellen-MacArthur-Foundation., 2013a. Towards the circular economy. Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition, Vol. 1.
17. Ellen-MacArthur-Foundation., 2013b. Towards the circular economy. Opportunities for the consumers goods sector. El-len MacArthur Foundation, Vol. 2.
18. European Commission. Closing the loop – An EU action plan for the Circular Economy. Communication from the Com-mission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels, 2.12.2015, COM (2015) 614 final.
19. European Academies' Science Advisory Council policy report 30, Indicators for a circular economy, 2016, 35 p.
20. Elia, V., Gnoni, M.G., Tornese, F. Measuring circular economy strategies through index methods: A critical analysis // Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 142, No. 4, 2016, pp. 2741-2751.
21. Federal Law Gazette I, page 2705 ‘Closed Substance Cycle and Waste Management Act’, 27 September 1994.
22. Franklin-Johnson, E., Figge, F., Canning, L. Resource duration as a managerial indicator for Circular Economy perfor-mance // Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 133, 2016, pp. 589-598.
23. Figge, F., Thorpe, A.S., Givry, P., Canning, L., Franklin-Johnson, E. Longevity and Circularity as Indicators of Eco-Efficient Resource Use in the Circular Economy // Ecological Economics, Vol. 150, 2018, pp. 297-306.
24. Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N.M.P., Hultink, E.J. The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm? // Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 143, 2017, pp. 757-768.
25. Gladyshev N.G. Scientific basics of recycling in techno-natural waste management clusters, Dissertation for obtaining the scientific degree of the doctor of technical sciences. Specialty: 03.02.08 Ecology (by branches), Samara, 2013, 301 p.
26. Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., Ulgiati S. A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of envi-ronmental and economic systems // Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 114, 2016, pp. 11-32.
27. Greyson, J. An economic instrument for zero waste, economic growth and sustainability // Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 15, No. 13-14, 2007, pp. 1382-1390.
28. Guidelines for National Waste Management Strategies Moving from Challenges to Opportunities. United Nations Environmental Programme, 2013, 112 р.
29. Haas, W., Krausmann, F., Wiedenhofer, D., Heinz, M. How circular is the global economy?: an assessment of material flows, waste production, and recycling in the European union and the world in 2005 // Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 19, No. 5, 2015, pp. 765-777.
30. Iacovidou, E., Velis, C.A., Purnell, P., Zwirner, O., Brown, A., Hahladakis, J., Millward-Hopkins, J., Williams, P.T. Metrics for optimising the multi-dimensional value of resources recovered from waste in a circular economy: A critical review // Journal of Clean-er Production, Vol. 166, 2017, pp. 910-938.
31. Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., Hekkert, M. Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions // Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 127, 2017, pp. 221-232.
32. Law of Environment Agency Japan ‘The Basic Act for Establishing a Sound Material-Cycle Society’, No.110, 2.06.2000.
33. Le`bre E., Corder G., Golev A. The Role of the Mining Industry in a Circular Economy. A Framework for Resource Man-agement at the Mine Site Level // Journal of Industrial Ecology, Special Issue: Exploring the Circular Economy, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2017, pp. 662-672.
34. Linder, M., Sarasini, S., van Loon, P. A Metric for Quantifying Product-Level Circularity // Journal of Industrial Ecology, Special Issue: Exploring the Circular Economy, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2017, pp. 545-558.
35. Moula, M.E., Sorvari J., Oinas P. Constructing a green circular society, Helsinki: University of Helsinki, 2018, 164 p.
36. Moreno, M., Rios, C., Rowe, Z., Fiona, C. A Conceptual Framework for Circular Design Sustainability // Sustainability, Vol. 8, No. 9, 2016, p. 937.
37. Moriguchi, Y. Material flow indicators to measure progress toward a sound material-cycle society // Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2007, pp. 112-120.
38. Murray, A., Skene, K., Haynes, K. The Circular Economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context // Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 140, No. 3, 2015, pp. 369-380.
39. Order of the President of the People’s Republic of China ‘Circular Economy Promotion Law of the People's Republic of China’ No. 4, 29.08.2008.
40. Pauliuk, S. Critical appraisal of the circular economy standard BS 8001:2017 and a dashboard of quantitative system in-dicators for its implementation in organizations // Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Vol. 129, 2018, pp. 81-92.
41. Park, J.Y., Chertow, M.R. Establishing and testing the ‘reuse potential’ indicator for managing wastes as resources // Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 137, 2014, pp. 45-53.
42. Pomponi, F., Moncaster A. Circular economy for the built environment: A research framework // Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 143, 2017, pp. 710-718.
43. Shevchenko, T., Laitala, K., Danko, Yu. Understanding Consumer E-Waste Recycling Behavior: Introducing a New Eco-nomic Incentive to Increase the Collection Rates // Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 9, 2019, pp. 2656.
44. Shevchenko, T., Kronenberg, J. Management of material and product circularity potential as an approach to operational-ise circular economy // Progress in Industrial Ecology, An International Journal, Vol. 14, No.1, 2020, pp. 30-57.
45. Shevchenko, T., Danko, Yu., Krasnorutskyy, O. Management of waste electrical and electronic products in compliance with the circular economy: What are the future Challenges for EU Member States? // International Journal of Ecology and Development, Vol. 3, No. 33, 2018, pp. 47-55.
46. Saidani, M., Yannou, B., Leroy, Y., Cluzel, F., Kendall, A. A taxonomy of circular economy indicators // Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 207, 2019, pp. 542-559.
47. Saidani, M., Yannou, B., Leroy, Y., Cluzel, F. How to Assess Product Performance in the Circular Economy? Proposed Requirements for the Design of a Circularity Measurement Framework // Recycling, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2017, p. 6.
48. Skene, K.R. Circles, spirals, pyramids and cubes: why the circular economy cannot work // Sustainability Science, pub-lished online: 5.05.2017.
49. Stahel, W., Reday-Mulvey, G. Jobs for tomorrow: The potential of substituting energy for manpower. Brussels; New York: Vantage, 1981.
50. Stahel, W. The Performance Economy, Second Edition, Palgrave-MacMillan, London, 2010, 350 p.
51. Telizhenko, O., Shevchenko, T., Mishenina, G. Sustainable Management of the Municipal Solid Waste Resource Poten-tial in the Context of Product Lifecycle Continuity // Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2016, pp. 664-671.
52. Velis, C.A, Brunner, P.H. Recycling and resource efficiency: it is time for a change from quantity to quality // Waste Man-agement & Research, Vol. 31, No. 6, 2013, pp. 539–540.
53. Wastling, T., Charnley, F., Moreno, M. Design for Circular Behaviour: Considering Users in a Circular Economy // Sus-tainability, Vol. 10, No. 6, 2018, p. 1743.
54. Weelden E., Mugge, R., Bakker, C. Paving the way towards circular consumption: exploring consumer acceptance of re-furbished mobile phones in the Dutch market // Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 113, 2016, pp. 743-754.
55. Zaman, A.U. Review: A comprehensive review of the development of zero waste management: lessons learned and guidelines // Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 91, 2014, pp. 1-14.
How to Cite
Shevchenko , T. (2019). Methodological approach to measuring progress towards a closed-loop economy model. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University, (4 (82), 30-35.